Schupp v. Taendler’s Empirical Analysis
154 F.2d 849 · 1946
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 1982
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blount v. Beall · Bannitz v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. · 58 Cal. App. 2d 673 - Carrasco v. Greco Canning Co. · Viers v. Webb · 18 La. App. 278 - Moore v. Oliphint
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“neither the complaint nor the statement of the case by counsel makes such a claim. So far as we are able to determine from the very unsatisfactory record in the case, no stipulation or agreement as to repayment was made, except that the loan should be paid on demand. In the circumstances, the sum loaned became due at once and the statutory period of limitations precludes the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“No action shall be brought * * * upon any simple contract, express or implied, or for the recovery of damages for any injury to real or personal property, or for the recovery of personal property, or damages for its unlawful detention after three years from the time when the right to maintain any such action shall have accrued; * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“money, being delivered as a loan payable on demand, became due at once and the statute of limitations ran from the date of the loan,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clarke v. Hickman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.