Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 F.3d 1023 - Bianchi v. Perry

Bianchi v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

154 F.3d 1023 · 1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
March 2002
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2101 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412

Relies on Calderon v. United States District Court · Myers v. Sullivan · Kolman v. Shalala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a request for attorneys' fees, including a request for attorneys' fees and expenses in administrative agency adjudications under 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(3), shall be filed ... within 14 days from the expiration of the period within which a petition for rehearing or suggestion for rehearing en banc may be filed....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a decision should be treated as `final and not appealable' for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act when the mandate issues or when the government's time to petition for certiorari expires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'final,' 'judgment,' and 'not appealable,' all have clearer meanings when applied to district courts than to courts of appeals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.