Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 F.3d 217 - Lang v. French

Lang v. French’s Empirical Analysis

154 F.3d 217 · 1998

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Securities & Exchange Commission v. McCarthy (2003), Carol Rae Cooper Foulds v. Texas Tech University (1999)

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2001998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cree v. Goldstein · Ratchford v. Gay Lib · Brewer v. United States · Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co. · Colonial Realty Corp. v. Bache & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “within the meaning of section 21(e)(1). 26 Moreover, we find the Fifth Circuit's decision in Lang persuasive. In Lang, a private litigant brought suit in federal district court seeking to enforce an NASD restitution order that the SEC affirmed. The court held that the plaintiff's reliance on the jurisdictional grant embodied in section 27 as the statutory basis for his private enforcement suit was misplaced. In so concluding, the court noted that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The fact that the SEC's order derives from the agency's adjudicatory role in the NASD's self-regulating disciplinary process ... has no bearing on the jurisdictional grant embodied in section 21(e)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[s]uch an inference is implicitly foreclosed, though, by the plain language of section 21(e)(1), which names the SEC as the only authorized applicant for judicial enforcement of SEC orders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.