Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 F.3d 937 - United States v. Odedo

United States v. Odedo’s Empirical Analysis

154 F.3d 937 · 1998

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2009
most recently cited

22 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 208 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on McCarthy v. United States · United States v. Bruce · United States v. Smith · United States v. Gastelum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Rule 11(h) `harmless error' standard applies to all Rule 11 errors, regardless of whether they were ever raised before the district court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the court must address the defendant personally in open court and inform the defendant”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “makes no change in the responsibilities of the Judge at Rule 11 proceedings, but instead merely rejects the extreme sanction of automatic reversal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.