Davis v. Fahey

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided November 17, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-11-17

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2005-11-17

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Darryl McLace Davis appeals the order of the magistrate judge * denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Davis v. Fahey, No. CA-04-607 (E.D.Va. Apr. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED

¶3 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000) and Fed.RXiv.P. 73, the parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge.