¶1 concurring specially:
¶2 I concur also for the following additional reasons: that the claim for equitable relief, namely vacating the divorce decree, having failed the legal relief should be denied, also Gentry Futch Co. v. Gentry, 90 Fla. 595.
154 Fla. 114
16 So.2d 816
Decided February 29, 1944
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1944-02-29
Relies on Gentry-Futch Co. v. Gentry
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1944-02-29
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 1989
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 concurring specially:
¶2 I concur also for the following additional reasons: that the claim for equitable relief, namely vacating the divorce decree, having failed the legal relief should be denied, also Gentry Futch Co. v. Gentry, 90 Fla. 595.