State v. Bowden’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 298 So. 2d 376 - State v. Beamon (1974), 425 So. 2d 36 - Baker v. State (1982)
78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Russell v. State · Hall v. State · Sanford v. State · Williams v. State · King v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"* * * The test is whether the defendant has been twice in jeopardy for the same identical crime, not whether he has been tried before upon the same acts, circumstances or situation the facts of which may sustain a conviction for a separate crime. * * * if the facts which will convict on a second prosecution would not necessarily have sustained a conviction on the former prosecution for the crime there charged, then the first prosecution will not stand as a bar to the second, although the offenses charged may have been committed in the same transaction. * * *"”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Anders · Brewer v. State“"The elements of the crime are (1) penetration of the female private parts by the private male organ, and (2) force of such a nature as to put the victim in such fear that she is thereby compelled to submit to the act. Barker v. State, 40 Fla. 178 , 24 So. 69 ; Russell v. State, 71 Fla. 236 , 71 So. 27 ." [4]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““[i]n an assault with intent to have unlawful carnal intercourse with an unmarried female of previous chaste character under the age of eighteen years the intent to then and there have sexual intercourse with the female is the gravamen, and .... there must be some overt act directed to the consummation of the unlawful intent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tulier v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.