Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 F. Supp. 98 - Preis v. Eversharp, Inc.

154 F. Supp. 98 - Preis v. Eversharp, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2004

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

70195719601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hume v. United States · E. F. Drew & Co. v. Reinhard · Mandel v. Liebman · Argus Co. v. . Mayor, Etc., of Albany · Dowse v. Federal Rubber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * and in the minutes of the day's doings of the body, being signed by the Clerk thereof, there is a subscription of the note or memorandum made by the party, by its agent duly authorized. This is a satisfactory compliance with the statute. It meets the purposes and intention of the law by providing an enduring and unchanging evidence of the agreement; and it meets its letter, for there is some note or memorandum of it in writing subscribed by the party to be charged thereby, the subscription made by an authorized agent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “For the employer to be entitled to a patent, it is not necessary that the contract should specifically so provide. It is “a question to be decided upon all the facts of the individual case.” In short, such a contract may be implied from the relations of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.