154 F. Supp. 2d 56 - Lewis v. Rumsfeld’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 34 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1094 · 10 U.S.C. § 624 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Hishon v. King & Spalding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the party making the motion would be unable to contest matters presented to the court for the first time in the opposing party's reply.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.