Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 ILL 458 - Coleman v. Howe

Coleman v. Howe’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
10
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Van Cleve v. Berkey (1898), Gillett v. Chicago Title & Trust Co. (1907)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 41 state decisions — followed in 10 states

1601895190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedColeman v. Howe

Relationships

Relies on Upton Assignee v. Tribilcock · Scovill v. Thayer · Hatch v. Dana · Clapp v. Peterson · Wetherbee v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ But if the property contributed is not valued in good faith, the shares of stock will not be fully paid up, either in law or fact, bv the contribution of such property. A declaration by the corporation that the shares are paid up will not avail against the creditors in case of insolvency. (2 Morawetz on Priv. Corp., Sec. 825.) The courts have inflexibly enforced the rule, that payment of stock subscriptions is good as against creditors only where payment has been made in money, or what may be fairly considered as money’s worth.’ (Wetherbee v. Baker, 35 N. J. Eq. 501.)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Cases may arise, where stock is issued for property taken at an overvaluation, which would justify courts in compelling stockholders to respond to the creditors for the pur value of the stock less the actual value of the property taken in exchange for it. Such will not be the case where there is entire good faith in making the valuation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.