154 Ind. App. 482 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

25 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““. . . [I]f . . . [the Defendant] thinks misconduct is of such a character that the damage cannot be repaired by any action of the court, [then Defendant should] move to discharge the jury or take such other steps as he may think will secure to him a fair trial. If he fails to do this, and permits the case to proceed to final determination, he must be deemed to have waived all questions arising out of such alleged misconduct.” 283 N.E.2d at 394 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 160 Ind. App. 390 - Hauk v. State

2. ““Where a trial judge makes voluntary remarks before the jury panel during voir dire, no error is preserved on appeal unless an objection is made at some time during the proceedings and before the jury retires for deliberation.” See: Micks v. State (1967), 249 Ind. 278, 282 , 230 N.E.2d 298, 301 ; Rexroat v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 688, 690 , 201 N.E.2d 558, 559 ; Coakley v. State (1972), 152 Ind. App. 280 , 283 N.E.2d 392 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 164 Ind. App. 26 - Mikel v. State

3. “Such cause may be presumed where the record is silent as to the reason for delay and the defendant made no objection.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Kindred v. State