Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 Ind. App. 685 - Curry v. State

154 Ind. App. 685 - Curry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1983
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Langley v. State · 154 Ind. App. 603 - Dixon v. State · Wilhoite v. State · Curry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This remedy is not a substitute for a direct appeal from the conviction and all available steps including those under Post-Conviction Remedy Rule 2 should be taken to perfect such an appeal. * * Post-Conviction Remedy Rule 1, § 1(b)- “All grounds for relief available to a petitioner under this rule must be raised in his original petition. Any ground •finally adjudicated on the merits or not so raised and knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived in the proceeding that resulted in the conviction or sentence, or in any other proceeding the petitioner has taken to secure relief, may not be the basis for a subsequent petition, unless the court finds a ground for relief asserted which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original petition.” Post-Conviction Remedy Rule 1, § 8. ■”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.