State v. Grey’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2006
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. King · State v. White · State v. Bell · State v. Reuter · State v. Ridgway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Under the law of this state, unexplained possession of recently stolen property is prima facie evidence of guilt sufficient to warrant conviction. ( State v. Bell, 109 Kan. 767 , 201 Pac. 1110 ; State v. White, 76 Kan. 654 , 92 Pac. 829 ; State v. Wood, 118 Kan. 58 , 233 Pac. 1029 .) "In State v. Rice, 93 Kan. 589 , 144 Pac. 1016 , it was held, as stated in the syllabus: "`Proof that a burglary was committed and that the stolen goods were shortly thereafter found in the possession of the accused, when considered in connection with all the other facts and circumstances of the case, including his failure satisfactorily to explain such possession, will sustain a conviction of burglary.'"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Oswald · State v. Wood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.