Daniels v. Charles’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1931
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While it is true that a widow may be endowed in a mine already opened, and it has also been held that, where a valid lease was made by the husband in his-lifetime, she is entitled to dower in the royalties, this rule applies only in the event the royalties are paid on coal mined from the land of which she is endowed. Priddy v. Griffith, 150 Ill. 560 , 41 Am. St. Rep. 397 . In the present case no coal has been mined from the dower-land. Should any coal be mined there in the future, she may present her claim in an independent action.”' 154 Ky. 235 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Daniels v. Charles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.