State v. Potts’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1975
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Howard · Niehoff v. Sahagian · State v. Corson · State v. Mahoney · State v. Ela
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whoever, when required to tell the truth on oath or affirmation lawfully administered, willfully and corruptly swears or affirms falsely to a material matter, in a proceeding before any court, tribunal or officer created by law, or in relation to which an oath or affirmation is authorized by law, is guilty of perjury”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. True““Indictments against persons for committing perjury before any court or tribunal drawn substantially as hereinafter provided are sufficient in{ law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. True
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.