Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 MICH 253 - Morris v. Vyse

Morris v. Vyse’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2008

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

6019081910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fred Macey Co. v. Macey · Tompkins v. Hollister · Edwards v. Michigan Tontine Investment Co. · Cullen v. O'Hara · Parks v. Crippin-Norris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ £In general, whenever the legal title to property, real or personal, has been obtained through actual fraud, misrepresentations, concealments, or through undue influence, duress, taking advantage of one’s weakness or necessities, or. through any- other similar means, or under any • other similar circumstances, which render it unconscionable for the holder of the legal title to retain and enjoy the beneficial interest, equity impresses a constructive trust on the property thus acquired in favor of the one who is truly and equitably entitled to the same, although he may never perhaps have had any legal estate therein; and a court of equity has jurisdiction to reach the property, either in the hands of the original wrongdoer, or in the hands of any subsequent holder, until a purchaser of if in good faith and without notice acquires a higher right, and takes the property relieved from the trust. The forms and varieties of these trusts, which are termed ‘ ‘ ex maleficio” or ££ex delicto,” are practically without limit. The principle is applied wherever it is necessary for the obtaining of complete justice, although the law may also give the remedy of damages against the wrongdoer.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.