Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 MINN 61 - State v. Wiebke

State v. Wiebke’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2014

9 state decisions

401922193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Land v. State · State ex rel. Johnson v. Becht · State v. Zeitler · State v. Allrick · Ex parte Bridgforth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The amendment of 1921 merely extends a remedy without creating a new liability. The same may be said in respect to the fixing of the amount of liability by the court instead of by the jury, and to the fixing of the sum to be paid at stated intervals for future support, and to whom.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.