Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 MOAPP 657 - Brosius v. Barker

Brosius v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
7
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently April 2005 · most notably Spurgeon v. Mission State Bank (1945), Delaware, L. & W. R. v. Petrowsky (1918)

6 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

801911192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ramsey v. Ramsey · Rounds Bros. v. McDaniel · Philpott v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Kelley v. Davis · Angel v. McLellan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Emancipation need not be evidenced by any formally executed instrument, or by any record act, but is a question of fact which may be proven from circumstances; and direct proof is not required, but it is never presumed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.