Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 N.C. 408 - Exum v. . R. R.

Exum v. . R. R.’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1982

16 state decisions

9019111920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McAdoo v. . Railroad · Cooper v. Railroad · Coleman v. . R. R. · Neal v. . R. R. · Meredith v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This rule is so just in itself and so generally enforced as controlling that citation of authority is hardly required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.