Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 N.C. App. 410 - State v. Lee

154 N.C. App. 410 - State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Drye v. United States · State v. Hennis · State v. Bullard · State v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Some of the factors that may be examined in determining the reliability of a showup identification are (1) the witness’ opportunity to observe the accused, (2) the witness’ degree of attention, (3) the accuracy of the witness’ description, (4) the witness’ level of certainty, and (5) the time elapsed between the crime and the confrontation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the admission of expert testimony regarding memory factors is within the trial court's discretion, and the appellate court will not intervene where the trial court properly appraises probative and prejudicial value of the evidence under Rule 403 and the Rules of Evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.