Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 N.C. App. 645 - State v. Walker

154 N.C. App. 645 - State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sutton v. United States · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co. · City of Los Angeles v. Department of Transportation · State v. Stephens · Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]efendant . . . failed to show that the jury may have reached a different result or that the trial court not severing the trials ex mero motu was so fundamental an error as to deny him a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “defendant . . . [could not] show that by failing to object to the joinder that his counsel was so deficient that it prejudiced his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.