154 N.C. App. 653 - State v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
September 2015
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McKeiver v. Pennsylvania · Sutton v. United States · State v. Olson · State v. Locklear · Washington v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The purpose of dispositions in juvenile actions is to design an appropriate plan to meet the needs of the juvenile and to achieve the objectives of the State in exercising jurisdiction, including the protection of the public. The court should develop a disposition in each case that: (1) Promotes public safety; (2) Emphasizes accountability and responsibility of both the parent, guardian, or custodian and the juvenile for the juvenile’s conduct; and (3). Provides the appropriate consequences, treatment, training, and rehabilitation to assist the juvenile toward becoming a 'nonoffending, responsible, and productive member of the community.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While protection of the public has received new emphasis, and accountability has become an integral part of rehabilitation, the Juvenile Code remains far from a punitive system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he juvenile system is designed to protect both the welfare of the delinquent child as well as the best interest of the State”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re TEF
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.