Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 N.J. 208 - HM Holdings, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

HM Holdings, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Pfizer, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau (1998), Robeson Industries Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (1999)

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 18 state decisions

120199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allstate Insurance v. Hague · Byrne v. United States · Arizona v. Evans · Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident Insurance · Gilbert Spruance Co. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “), National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the protection of New Jersey policyholders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.