Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 Ohio App. 3d 301 - State v. Pulaski

154 Ohio App. 3d 301 - State v. Pulaski’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · State v. Thompkins · Blakemore v. Blakemore · Mapp v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o the extent that the testimony reports the result of a procedure, test, or experiment, the testimony is reliable only if * * * [t]he particular procedure, test, or experiment was conducted in a way that will yield an accurate result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.