154 Ohio App. 3d 380 - State v. McCain’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Carter · 124 Ohio App. 3d 706 - State v. McNamara · 86 Ohio App. 3d 592 - State v. Guysinger · Shifrin v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc. · 100 Ohio App. 3d 688 - State v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A warrantless search performed pursuant to a condition of [probation] requiring a [probationer] to submit to random searches of his or her person, motor vehicle, or place of residence by a [probation] officer at any time is constitutional”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Norman“[t]here is no material difference between probationers and parolees with regard to constitutional guarantees”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Norman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.