154 Ohio App. 3d 493 - State v. Ali’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
71 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably State v. Dawson (2017), State v. Cossack, Unpublished Decision (3-4-2005) (2005)
71 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · State v. Thompkins · Mapp v. Ohio · State v. Dehass · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and thus subject to suppression, even if we were to find the police seizure was illegal. {¶ 23} The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule, which [the defendant] seeks to invoke, does not sanction violence as an acceptable response to improper police conduct. The exclusionary rule only pertains to evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search and seizure.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“can encompass a present state of fear of bodily harm and a fear of bodily harm in the future.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Intihar · In re P.T.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.