Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 Ohio App. 3d 59 - State v. Goff

154 Ohio App. 3d 59 - State v. Goff’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Bradley · State v. Long · Idaho v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that a defendant will not be convicted based upon charges of unseen, unknown, and unchallengeable witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Love, Unpublished Decision (3-27-2006)
  2. “), to the Portage County Department of Job and Family Services (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In the Matter of Goff, Unpublished Decision (11-14-2003)
  3. “confronted with the witnesses against him”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Goff, Unpublished Decision (2-2-2005)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.