154 Ohio App. 3d 717 - State v. Mayl’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The General Assembly established the threshold criteria for the admissibility of alcohol-test results in prosecutions for driving under the influence and driving with a prohibited concentration of alcohol in R.C. 4511.19 (D). That section, which governs the admissibility of alcohol-test results, provides that a defendant's blood, breath, or urine `shall be analyzed in accordance with methods approved by the director of health by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the director of health pursuant to section 3701.143 of the Revised Code.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Wells, Unpublished Decision (3-5-2004)

2. “as a proximate result of committing a violation of division (A) of section 4511.19 of the Revised Code or of a substantially equivalent municipal ordinance.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Wells, Unpublished Decision (3-5-2004)

3. “the burden to show that the test-result evidence does not suffer from the defects alleged in Mayl's motion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Wells, Unpublished Decision (3-5-2004)