Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1950-06-21
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2004
3 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1
dissenting. I concur in the syllabus but dissent from the judgment for the reason that in my opinion the record affirmatively shows that the jury based its verdict upon the supposed amount of a casualty insurance policy rather than giving such damages as it may have thought proportioned to the pecuniary injury resulting from the death of plaintiff’s decedent.
Hart and Taft, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
