Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 Okla. 145 - Carter v. Barry

Carter v. Barry’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2003

6 state decisions

3019321940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McPherson v. · Turnbull v. Payson · Campbell v. Dick · Drennan v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In an action brought for possession of real property by one holding a valid agricultural lease thereon against one in wrongful occupation thereof, the measure of damages is the value of the use of the property, and not the actual rents received by the party in the wrongful possession.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The detriment caused by the wrongful occupation of real property, * * * is deemed to be the value of the use of the property for the time of such occupation, * * * and the costs, if any, of recovering the possession.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.