State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
January 2021
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Crawford v. Washington · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 104 Wash. 2d 412 - State v. Guloy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, statements of fault are inadmissible, but much, of course, depends on the context in which such statement are made. In domestic violence and sexual abuse situations, a declarant's statement disclosing the identity of a closely-related perpetrator is admissible under [Evidence Rule] 803(a)(4) because part of reasonable treatment and therapy is to prevent recurrence and future injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he purpose of the questionnaire was two-fold: to gather evidence and to identify treatable describe. [The nurse] examined [the victim] based on the history she obtained and, after the examination, provided [the victim] with information on sexually transmitted diseases and the risk of pregnancy. She also used the questionnaire to determine what kind of follow-up referrals were necessary or helpful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A party demonstrates a statement to be reasonably pertinent when (1) the declarant’s motive in making the statement is to promote treatment, and (2) the medical professional reasonably relied on the statement for purposes of treatment. State v. Butler, 53 Wash.App. 214, 220 , 766 P.2d 505 (1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.