E.R. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1912 (§ 102 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978)
Relies on State v. Crosby · State ex rel. E.H. v. A.H. · In the Interest of J.C. · R.G. v. State · State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Violation of a rule should not itself ... create any presumption ... that a legal duty has been breached.... The [rlules are designed to provide guidance to lawyers and to provide a structure for regulating conduct through disciplinary agencies'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.