Jeane v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1967
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co. · Rausch v. Barrere · Duval v. Harvey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 1 of Act No. 239, 1918, p. 429, to which we have referred, in declaring that dogs should not ran at large, evidently has reference to dogs assessed; otherwise it would not have provided for any liability in damages where killed by a citizen or officer, as no damages could be claimed for a dog not assessed, as such is not property. A dog roaming at large must, however, be tagged, as required under section 3 of that statute, to entitle the owner to recover for its value, if killed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Provided, that any citizen or officer may kill any dangerous or vicious dog, or dogs not registered as herein provided for,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No citizen or officer shall be liable to damages or to prosecution by reason of killing any dog as herein provided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.