Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 SO 757 - Jeane v. Johnson

Jeane v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1967
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co. · Rausch v. Barrere · Duval v. Harvey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 1 of Act No. 239, 1918, p. 429, to which we have referred, in declaring that dogs should not ran at large, evidently has reference to dogs assessed; otherwise it would not have provided for any liability in damages where killed by a citizen or officer, as no damages could be claimed for a dog not assessed, as such is not property. A dog roaming at large must, however, be tagged, as required under section 3 of that statute, to entitle the owner to recover for its value, if killed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Provided, that any citizen or officer may kill any dangerous or vicious dog, or dogs not registered as herein provided for,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “No citizen or officer shall be liable to damages or to prosecution by reason of killing any dog as herein provided.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.