Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 SO3D 426 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State · Brown v. State · 472 So. 2d 1174 - Toole v. State · Mulder v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles · Duncan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Constructive possession exists where a defendant does not have actual physical possession of contraband but knows of its presence on or about his premises and has the ability to exercise dominion and control over it. Mere proximity to contraband, standing alone, is insufficient to establish constructive possession of the substance. The state must present independent proof of the defendant’s knowledge and ability to control the contraband.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A motion for judgment of acquittal should be granted only when it is apparent that no legally sufficient evidence has been submitted under which a jury could find a verdict of guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.