Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 SW2D 944 - Warren v. Osborne

Warren v. Osborne’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2008

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

601941195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelley v. Ward · Columbian Nat. Life Ins. v. Black · Peques v. Dilworth · Parish v. Camplin · Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co. v. Hewitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Courts of equity are not bound by cast-iron rules, but are governed by rules which are flexible and adapt themselves to particular exigencies, so that relief will be granted when, in view of all the circumstances, to deny it would permit one party to suffer a gross wrong at the hands of the other.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * such alleged negligence as here is excusable and will not defeat the interposition of equity to carry out the mutual intent and prevent a gross injustice. (Citing numerous authorities).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Knowledge by one party of the other’s mistake regarding the expression of the contract is equivalent to mutual mistake.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.