Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 S.W.3d 486 - State v. Collins

State v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. O'BRIEN · State v. Cole · State v. Smith · State v. Dudley · State v. Wilkerson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and article I, section 18(a) of the Missouri Constitution require that a criminal defendant be given notice of the charge or charges against him to allow him the opportunity to adequately prepare a defense. The charging instrument, the information or indictment, serves that purpose. Thus, as a general rule, due process mandates that a criminal defendant may not be convicted of an offense not expressly charged in the information or indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] conviction based on an offense not properly charged in the charging instrument is a nullity, as the trial court acquires no jurisdiction over non-charged offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “did not involve the same criminal conduct”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.