State v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. O'BRIEN · State v. Cole · State v. Smith · State v. Dudley · State v. Wilkerson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and article I, section 18(a) of the Missouri Constitution require that a criminal defendant be given notice of the charge or charges against him to allow him the opportunity to adequately prepare a defense. The charging instrument, the information or indictment, serves that purpose. Thus, as a general rule, due process mandates that a criminal defendant may not be convicted of an offense not expressly charged in the information or indictment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“[a] conviction based on an offense not properly charged in the charging instrument is a nullity, as the trial court acquires no jurisdiction over non-charged offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Waggoner v. State“did not involve the same criminal conduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ayansu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.