Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 Tex. 35 - Murphy v. Slaton

Murphy v. Slaton’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

146
cited by 146 later decisions
5
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 131 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 146 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably 53 Cal. 2d 567 - Brewer v. Simpson (1960), Hamilton v. Hamilton (1955)

12 federal appellate · 131 state decisions

5001954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nye v. Bradford · Edds v. Mitchell, Admr. · Harrell v. Hickman · Caples v. Ward · Chadwick v. Bristow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * We find no language in the 1928 will evidencing an intention to dispose of the estate owned by the survivor at death, and we therefore hold that only the property owned by B. H. Murphy and Annie E. Murphy—either or both, at the time of the death of B. H. Murphy—was within the terms of the 1928 will. As to all property acquired by Annie E. Murphy in her individual right after B. H. Murphy's death, she had the full right of ownership and power to dispose of the same by will or otherwise as she saw fit."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"`It is our will and desire that the survivor of us, J. W. Dougherty or Callie Dougherty, as the case may be, shall, with the rights and authority below given, have all the estate of every description, real, personal, or mixed, which either or both of us may own, to be used, occupied, enjoyed, conveyed and expended by and during the life of such survivor, as such survivor shall desire, and that upon the death of such survivor any of such estate then remaining shall be divided equally among the persons following:'" (Thereafter follows the names of the testators' six children).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is our will and desire that the survivor of us ... shall, with the rights and authority below given, have all the estate of every description, real, personal or mixed, which either or both of us may own at our death, to be used, enjoyed, occupied and conveyed by such survivor for and during his or her life time, as the case may be, and that upon the death of such survivor any of such estate then remaining shall be divided among the persons following and in the following manner....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.