¶1ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.
¶2Appellant challenges the correctness of our conclusion expressed in the original opinion. He presents no new question.
¶3As to the search of the automobile, it may be added that because the whisky was open to the view of the officer, no search of the automobile was made, or necessary to be made, by which the whisky was discovered.
¶4Believing the case properly disposed of originally, the motion for rehearing is overruled.
¶5Opinion approved by the court.