Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 U.S. 118 - Haytian Republic

Haytian Republic’s Empirical Analysis

154 U.S. 118 · 1894

Citation profile

267
cited by 267 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

88 federal appellate · 35 district · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 267 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Nevada v. United States (1983), The Oregon (1895)

88 federal appellate · 35 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 13 states

52018941900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Watson v. Jones · Dowell v. Applegate · United States v. Ames · Stark v. Starr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 267 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There must be the same parties, or, at least, such as represent the same interests; there must be the same rights asserted and the same relief prayed for; the relief must be founded upon the same facts, and the . . . essential basis, of the relief sought must be the same.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the true test of the sufficiency of a plea of `other suit pending' in another forum [i]s the legal efficacy of the first suit, when finally disposed of, as `the thing adjudged,' regarding the matters at issue in the second suit.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * * whether the evidence necessary to prove one cause of action would establish the other”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.