¶1ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
¶2Thompson v. Perrine, 106 U. S. 589, followed.
¶3Mr. F. N. Bangs and Mr. Timothy F. Brush for plaintiff in error.
¶4Mr. William M. Evarts, Mr. James K. Hill and Mr. H. T. Wing for defendant in error.
¶6delivered the opinion of the eoiirt.
¶7This case is controlled by the decision just made in case No. 76 between the same parties. The judgment is affirmed.