154 Wash. 2d 291 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
October 2010
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 41 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Ohio v. Roberts · Williamson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ven testimonial statements may be admitted if offered for purposes other than to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Theders · State v. Shafer“It is necessary to look at the cireumstances of the 911 call in each case to determine whether the declarant knowingly provided the func tional equivalent of testimony to a government agent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“excited utterance ... `made without reflection or deliberation'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ohlson · State v. Shafer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.