State v. Meacham’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 107 Wash. 2d 346 - State v. Knapstad · State v. Armendariz · 119 Wash. 2d 504 - City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he prosecuting attorney shall file a special allegation of sexual motivation . . . when sufficient admissible evidence exists, which, when considered with the most plausible, reasonably foreseeable defense that could be raised under the evidence, would justify a finding of sexual motivation by a reasonable and objective fact-finder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Rice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.