Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 Wis. 2d 116 - State v. McQuay

154 Wis. 2d 116 - State v. McQuay’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
4
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

87 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably 207 Wis. 2d 258 - State v. Smith (1997), State v. Williams (2002)

87 state decisions

3801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Carolina v. Alford · Santobello v. New York · Estelle v. Smith · 93 Wis. 2d 278 - Elias v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he preparer of a presentence report is to be a neutral and independent participant in the sentencing process. It necessarily follows that a parole or probation officer acts on behalf of an independent judiciary, not as an agent of the state, in preparing a presentence report. Like the sentencing court, the preparer of a presentence report is neither a party to nor bound by a plea agreement between the defendant and the state and, therefore, cannot breach the terms of that agreement in preparing the report.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “determining the character of the defendant and the need for his incarceration and rehabilitation.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “be immunized by a plea agreement between the defendant and the state.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.