154 Wis. 2d 387 - State v. Coogan’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably 208 Wis. 2d 463 - State v. McCallum (1997), 203 Wis. 2d 497 - State v. Eckert (1996)
4 federal appellate · 50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Rock v. Arkansas · Michigan v. Clifford · 124 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Pitsch · Nachtsheim v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the evidence was discovered after trial; (2) the defendant was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue; (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative to the evidence presented at trial; and (5) a reasonable probability exists of a different result in a new trial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“We need not reach the question of whether an expert's opinion based solely on inadmissible evidence, but that of a type reasonably relied on in his field, is admissible. However, this court has suggested that at some point when the reliability of the underlying evidence is called seriously into question, it is permissible to bar the expert's testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“related a version of events that, if believed, demonstrated he was suffering a dissociative flashback episode to his Vietnam experience at the time of the killings. He perceived himself as searching a suspected enemy hut in Vietnam looking for Viet Cong guerrillas or documents, rather than robbing the tavern.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.