Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 Wis. 2d 804 - State v. Allen

154 Wis. 2d 804 - State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 144 Wis. 2d 388 - State v. Schumacher · 150 Wis. 2d 861 - State v. Harp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the court finds that the judgment was rendered without jurisdiction, or that the sentence imposed was not authorized by law or is otherwise open to collateral attack, or that there has been such a denial or infringement of the constitutional rights of the prisoner as to render the judgment vulnerable to collateral attack, the court shall vacate and set the judgment aside and shall discharge the prisoner or resentence him or grant a new trial or correct the sentence as may appear appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.