Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 W. Va. 805 - State Ex Rel. Cogar v. Haynes

154 W. Va. 805 - State Ex Rel. Cogar v. Haynes’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1985
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Patton v. State of North Carolina · 140 W. Va. 547 - State v. McGraw · 149 W. Va. 6 - State Ex Rel. Powers v. Boles · 149 W. Va. 324 - State Ex Rel. Whytsell v. Boles · 152 W. Va. 500 - State Ex Rel. Strickland v. Melton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(c) When the court determines to deny or grant relief, as the case may be, the court may enter an appropriate order with respect to the conviction or sentence in the former criminal proceedings and such supplementary matters as are deemed necessary and proper to the findings in the case, including, but not limited to, remand, the vacating or setting aside of the plea, conviction and sentence, rearraignment, retrial, custody, bail, discharge, correction of sentence and re-sentencing, or other matters which may be necessary and proper. In any order entered in accordance with the provisions of this section, the court shall make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to each contention or contentions and grounds (in fact or law) advanced, shall clearly state the grounds upon which the matter was determined, and shall state whether a federal and/or state right was presented and decided. Any order entered in accordance with the provisions of this section shall constitute a final judgment, and, unless reversed, shall be conclusive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Immaterial, unnecessary and harmless averments, which might be omitted without affecting the charge in an indictment against the accused and which need not be proved, may be properly considered and rejected as surplusage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.