Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

155 A.2d 73

Tibbs v. Tibbs

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1959

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1959-10-21

Relies on Schreiber v. Schreiber

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1959-10-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably State v. Hauck (1973), Rouse v. United States (1979)

27 state decisions — followed in 13 states

601959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HOOD, Associate Judge.

¶1Appellant sued for an absolute divorce on the ground of desertion for two years. Her husband did not appear and was represented by court-appointed counsel. Her evidence tended to show that her husband had physically abused her and that she, who had suffered from rheumatic fever since childhood, being fearful for her health, had left him and had lived apart from him for more than two years. The trial court held that appellant had failed to establish grounds for an absolute divorce for desertion, but granted a limited divorce on the ground of cruelty.

¶2Appellant says the trial court was in error in denying her an absolute divorce. Her point is well taken. The trial court found cruelty justifying a limited divorce. Such cruelty justified appellant in separating from her husband, and this constituted constructive desertion on his part. Schreiber v. Schreiber, D.C.Mun.App., 139 A.2d 278.

¶3Reversed with instructions to grant an absolute divorce.

/155/a2d/73 · .json · Public domain