State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Reavis v. Solminski (1996), State v. Olivio (1991)
2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · United States v. Dinitz · Richardson v. United States · State v. Leon · State v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The victim is coerced by the immediate use or threatened use of force against a person or property. (b) The victim is incapable of consent by reason of mental disorder, drugs, alcohol, sleep or any other similar impairment of cognition and such condition is known or should have reasonably been known to the defendant. (c) The victim is intentionally deceived as to the nature of the act. (d) The victim is intentionally deceived to erroneously believe that the person is the victim’s spouse. (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“mental disorder was an impairment of such a degree that it precluded the victim from understanding the act of intercourse and its possible consequences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reavis v. Solminski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.