Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 CALAPP2D 259 - People v. Stone

People v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
November 1981
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 1981

20 state decisions

1201957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Scott · 17 Cal. App. 430 - Ehat v. Scheidt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In People v. Scott, 24 Cal.2d 774 [ 151 P.2d 517 ], it was said at pages 778 and 779: ‘As it now reads the statute [section 954] permits the joinder of different offenses, even though they do not relate to the same transaction or event, if there is a common element of substantial importance in their commission, for the joinder prevents repetition of evidence and saves time and expense to the state as well as to the defendant.’ In the present case a common element of substantial importance in the commission of the crimes charged in both informations was the use of the automobile. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.