155 Cal. App. 4th 113 - People v. Foss’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · 64 Cal. 2d 159 - Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego County · 42 Cal. 3d 284 - People v. Barnes · 39 Cal. 4th 641 - People v. Ledesma · 7 Cal. 4th 1075 - People v. Fudge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the evidence the defendant seeks to elicit on cross-examination is not within the scope of direct examination, an offer of proof is required to preserve the issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he substance, purpose, and relevance of the excluded evidence was made known to the court by the questions asked, an offer of proof, or by any other means ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Normally, if the trial court excludes evidence on cross-examination, no offer of proof is necessary to preserve the issue for consideration on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.